Retrospective application of beneficial circulars upheld, binding officers and granting post adjudication relief where adjudication occurred after cir...
Admissibility of Investigation Statements requires witness examination before the adjudicating authority; otherwise statements cannot sustain a penalt...
Transaction value and connected person treatment in excise valuation: proprietary concerns not inter connected undertakings, relief on valuation and c...
Appointment of Registrars as adjudicating officers under Companies Act reallocates territorial jurisdiction and sets appeal route to Regional Director...
Composite supply of drilling services and site specific chemicals characterised as composite supply; prior advance rulings set aside, tax rate left op...
Reversal of input tax credit was predicated on classification of...
Reversal of input tax credit in proportion to exempt supply: specificity of show-cause notice required; order set aside, fresh proceedings allowed with limitation exclusion
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Reversal of input tax credit was predicated on classification of goods as non-exempt though the show-cause notice did not raise that ground; the notice failed the legally required specificity and the adjudication proceeded beyond the matters pleaded, breaching principles of audi alteram partem and statutory notice requirements, and therefore the adjudication order was set aside. The respondents remain free to initiate fresh proceedings in accordance with law, subject to exclusion of the period from February 24, 2025 until disposal of the writ petition or receipt of certified copy when computing limitation for any new proceedings.
Reversal of input tax credit was predicated on classification of goods as non-exempt though the show-cause notice did not raise that ground; the notice failed the legally required specificity and the adjudication proceeded beyond the matters pleaded, breaching principles of audi alteram partem and statutory notice requirements, and therefore the adjudication order was set aside. The respondents remain free to initiate fresh proceedings in accordance with law, subject to exclusion of the period from February 24, 2025 until disposal of the writ petition or receipt of certified copy when computing limitation for any new proceedings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.