Minimum Import Price restrictions for Black Pepper, Areca-nuts and Apples upheld; procedural laying failure not fatal, notifications to be placed befo...
Transaction value between related persons requires market-equivalent pricing; importer must prove declared value mirrors ordinary international trade ...
Classification of exported insecticides under export tariff affirmed; reclassification and related penalties set aside and MEIS scrip jurisdiction rec...
Misclassification between copra and dry coconut: customs recovery and re-valuation quashed for lack of prior licensing-authority invalidation, appeals...
Availment of input tax credit based on invoices issued by non-existing dealers is unsustainable where the taxpayer failed to respond to antecedent show cause notices, with resulting assessments under the relevant provisions remaining operative and rectification applications rejected. Statements of e-way bills alone are inadequate to prove physical receipt of goods; documentary proof such as delivery challans and receipts is required, and reliance solely on e-way bill summaries will not substantiate input tax credit claims. Writ remedies are not maintainable where statutory remedy and proceedings under the assessment scheme are available.
Availment of input tax credit based on invoices issued by non-existing dealers is unsustainable where the taxpayer failed to respond to antecedent show cause notices, with resulting assessments under the relevant provisions remaining operative and rectification applications rejected. Statements of e-way bills alone are inadequate to prove physical receipt of goods; documentary proof such as delivery challans and receipts is required, and reliance solely on e-way bill summaries will not substantiate input tax credit claims. Writ remedies are not maintainable where statutory remedy and proceedings under the assessment scheme are available.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
