Proceeds of crime and money laundering: PMLA prosecution requires subsisting predicate offence; discharge of predicate accused precludes further prose...
Validity of faceless assessment procedure challenged for jurisdictional AO intervention mid-remand, resulting in quashing of assessment for procedural...
Dispute concerned additions to income under section 68 and section 56(2)(viib) alleging unexplained large share capital and excessive premium. Tribunal found that notices to lenders were duly issued and acknowledged and that lenders filed confirmations, so the file contained materials establishing the genuineness, identity and creditworthiness of creditors; this factual appreciation led to dismissal of the revenue's appeal. Non-appearance of directors under summons was noted but did not negate the documentary evidence confirming transactions.
Dispute concerned additions to income under section 68 and section 56(2)(viib) alleging unexplained large share capital and excessive premium. Tribunal found that notices to lenders were duly issued and acknowledged and that lenders filed confirmations, so the file contained materials establishing the genuineness, identity and creditworthiness of creditors; this factual appreciation led to dismissal of the revenue's appeal. Non-appearance of directors under summons was noted but did not negate the documentary evidence confirming transactions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
