Employee recoveries, input tax credit and notice pay recovery under GST: AAR distinguishes taxable supplies from non-taxable perquisites and penalties...
Liberal construction of sufficient cause justifies condonation of inordinate delay where criminal proceedings and jail confinement explained the defau...
Page of 4826
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
5041 to 5060 of 96510 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Dispute concerns revenue recognition where the assessing officer treated finished goods/advances as sales despite the assessee following the project completion method. The tribunal found that the amounts were offered to tax in subsequent assessment years and taxed on profits thereon, making the AO's estimate result in double taxation; accordingly the addition treating such stock/advances as turnover was deleted. Reliance on precedents supporting deletion where income is taxed in later years was noted. Resultantly, all grounds of appeal raising this treatment were allowed and the impugned additions were set aside.
Dispute concerns revenue recognition where the assessing officer treated finished goods/advances as sales despite the assessee following the project completion method. The tribunal found that the amounts were offered to tax in subsequent assessment years and taxed on profits thereon, making the AO's estimate result in double taxation; accordingly the addition treating such stock/advances as turnover was deleted. Reliance on precedents supporting deletion where income is taxed in later years was noted. Resultantly, all grounds of appeal raising this treatment were allowed and the impugned additions were set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.