Reopening Assessments invalid where satisfaction and jurisdictional approval are absent for third party seized material, leading to quashing of assess...
Benami property exclusion from the insolvency estate: Benami Act proceedings preclude IBC tribunals from reopening attachments or treating such assets...
Exclusion of limitation period: pandemic suspension plus debtor acknowledgement can extend limitation, requiring fresh factfinding on guarantee invoca...
The text addresses personal liability of directors in regulatory enforcement, holding that designation alone does not establish personal liability and that vicarious liability requires specific findings of individual involvement; this principle limits attachment of personal bank, demat and trading accounts absent substantive averments. It emphasises principles of natural justice and the limited scope of judicial review under Article 226 where regulatory findings entail factual appreciation, concluding that reasoned statutory orders invoking recovery and attachment powers under the SEBI Act warrant pursuit of the alternative statutory remedy before the Securities Appellate Tribunal rather than writ relief.
The text addresses personal liability of directors in regulatory enforcement, holding that designation alone does not establish personal liability and that vicarious liability requires specific findings of individual involvement; this principle limits attachment of personal bank, demat and trading accounts absent substantive averments. It emphasises principles of natural justice and the limited scope of judicial review under Article 226 where regulatory findings entail factual appreciation, concluding that reasoned statutory orders invoking recovery and attachment powers under the SEBI Act warrant pursuit of the alternative statutory remedy before the Securities Appellate Tribunal rather than writ relief.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
