Mis-declaration and Concealment: confiscation affirmed, transaction value re-determined and mandatory penalty sustained; redemption allowed on payment...
Page of 4821
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
5761 to 5780 of 96408 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Liability to pay customs duty for goods imported under Special Advance Authorization was remitted for fresh consideration because the impugned order was non-speaking and did not address the petitioners contention that customs duty was not payable in view of Special Advance Authorization and a Customs Notification dated 01.04.2023; the respondent is directed to afford a personal hearing, decide on merits in accordance with law within four weeks, and, if the petitioner succeeds, consider waiver of detention and demurrage charges in accordance with law.
Liability to pay customs duty for goods imported under Special Advance Authorization was remitted for fresh consideration because the impugned order was non-speaking and did not address the petitioners contention that customs duty was not payable in view of Special Advance Authorization and a Customs Notification dated 01.04.2023; the respondent is directed to afford a personal hearing, decide on merits in accordance with law within four weeks, and, if the petitioner succeeds, consider waiver of detention and demurrage charges in accordance with law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.