Bona fide disclosure requirements govern under-reporting penalties, and post-penalty immunity applications cannot secure available statutory protectio...
Certificate-of-origin verification procedure governs preferential customs benefits; denial without retroactive verification was set aside with consequ...
Disciplinary Committee jurisdiction and mandatory investigation requirements invalidated cancellation of an insolvency professional's registration and...
Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Page of 4788
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
881 to 900 of 95752 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The challenge concerned entitlement to input tax credit (ITC) affected by the limitation regime: the claim was found barred under the limitation provision of the CGST Act but fell within the period preserved by the proviso permitting claims within an alternate prescribed period, resulting in quashing of the impugned order insofar as it denied ITC on limitation grounds. Consequentially, departmental action premised solely on limitation was restrained, petitioners were granted liberty to seek refund which the department must decide on merits, and any bank accounts frozen under the impugned order were directed to be de-frozen.
The challenge concerned entitlement to input tax credit (ITC) affected by the limitation regime: the claim was found barred under the limitation provision of the CGST Act but fell within the period preserved by the proviso permitting claims within an alternate prescribed period, resulting in quashing of the impugned order insofar as it denied ITC on limitation grounds. Consequentially, departmental action premised solely on limitation was restrained, petitioners were granted liberty to seek refund which the department must decide on merits, and any bank accounts frozen under the impugned order were directed to be de-frozen.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.