Attachment and proclamation of sale of immovable property: limitation treated from financial year end; proclamation held within period, petition dismi...
Second Schedule attachment and validity of a post-notice mortgage: TRO cannot declare mortgage void ab initio; sale and appropriation allowed thereaft...
Limitation for final assessment under sections 144C and 153 treated jointly, resulting in quashing of timebarred assessment order and liberty to reviv...
Deductibility of settlement payments for securities law penalties and treatment of unexplained cash credits in share trading -- Tribunal upholds posit...
Threshold for allottee-initiated insolvency petitions in leasehold real estate upheld; petition admitted after possession letters deemed legally ineff...
Page of 4814
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
6541 to 6560 of 96262 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The challenge concerned entitlement to input tax credit (ITC) affected by the limitation regime: the claim was found barred under the limitation provision of the CGST Act but fell within the period preserved by the proviso permitting claims within an alternate prescribed period, resulting in quashing of the impugned order insofar as it denied ITC on limitation grounds. Consequentially, departmental action premised solely on limitation was restrained, petitioners were granted liberty to seek refund which the department must decide on merits, and any bank accounts frozen under the impugned order were directed to be de-frozen.
The challenge concerned entitlement to input tax credit (ITC) affected by the limitation regime: the claim was found barred under the limitation provision of the CGST Act but fell within the period preserved by the proviso permitting claims within an alternate prescribed period, resulting in quashing of the impugned order insofar as it denied ITC on limitation grounds. Consequentially, departmental action premised solely on limitation was restrained, petitioners were granted liberty to seek refund which the department must decide on merits, and any bank accounts frozen under the impugned order were directed to be de-frozen.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.