Employee recoveries, input tax credit and notice pay recovery under GST: AAR distinguishes taxable supplies from non-taxable perquisites and penalties...
Liberal construction of sufficient cause justifies condonation of inordinate delay where criminal proceedings and jail confinement explained the defau...
Page of 4826
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
5041 to 5060 of 96510 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The challenge concerned entitlement to input tax credit (ITC) affected by the limitation regime: the claim was found barred under the limitation provision of the CGST Act but fell within the period preserved by the proviso permitting claims within an alternate prescribed period, resulting in quashing of the impugned order insofar as it denied ITC on limitation grounds. Consequentially, departmental action premised solely on limitation was restrained, petitioners were granted liberty to seek refund which the department must decide on merits, and any bank accounts frozen under the impugned order were directed to be de-frozen.
The challenge concerned entitlement to input tax credit (ITC) affected by the limitation regime: the claim was found barred under the limitation provision of the CGST Act but fell within the period preserved by the proviso permitting claims within an alternate prescribed period, resulting in quashing of the impugned order insofar as it denied ITC on limitation grounds. Consequentially, departmental action premised solely on limitation was restrained, petitioners were granted liberty to seek refund which the department must decide on merits, and any bank accounts frozen under the impugned order were directed to be de-frozen.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.