Scope of judicial review under Article 226: supervisory, not appellate; factual reappraisal barred, challenge dismissed; insolvency professional dutie...
Courier transshipment of imported goods via named carrier to air cargo stations renewed until 30.01.2026; exemption conditional, strict controls apply...
Insurer's investment gains and investment write-downs face Section 263 revision; enquiry upheld, Rule 5(b)(ii) lapse sustained, late corrigendum quash...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
7241 to 7260 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Permission to file a statutory appeal was considered by condoning a 478-day delay to determine admissibility; the court quashed the impugned assessment order and remitted the matter to the original authority for fresh adjudication on merits. The remand was made conditional on the petitioner depositing the entire tax amount confirmed in the assessment from its electronic cash register within thirty days of receipt of the order. The time-bar under the GST appeal regime and the deposit requirement governed the court's operative relief.
Permission to file a statutory appeal was considered by condoning a 478-day delay to determine admissibility; the court quashed the impugned assessment order and remitted the matter to the original authority for fresh adjudication on merits. The remand was made conditional on the petitioner depositing the entire tax amount confirmed in the assessment from its electronic cash register within thirty days of receipt of the order. The time-bar under the GST appeal regime and the deposit requirement governed the court's operative relief.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
