Misdeclaration of quantity rejected where supplier evidence established counting errors, so reassessment, confiscation and redemption fine were set as...
Admissibility of electronic evidence controls valuation and penalty exposure; non compliant e records and statements nullify revaluation and penalties...
Permission to file a statutory appeal was considered by condoning a 478-day delay to determine admissibility; the court quashed the impugned assessment order and remitted the matter to the original authority for fresh adjudication on merits. The remand was made conditional on the petitioner depositing the entire tax amount confirmed in the assessment from its electronic cash register within thirty days of receipt of the order. The time-bar under the GST appeal regime and the deposit requirement governed the court's operative relief.
Permission to file a statutory appeal was considered by condoning a 478-day delay to determine admissibility; the court quashed the impugned assessment order and remitted the matter to the original authority for fresh adjudication on merits. The remand was made conditional on the petitioner depositing the entire tax amount confirmed in the assessment from its electronic cash register within thirty days of receipt of the order. The time-bar under the GST appeal regime and the deposit requirement governed the court's operative relief.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
