Overlapping GST proceedings require Central and State authorities to designate one competent authority for coordinated adjudication of the same matter...
Composite healthcare supplies retain exemption when patient care is the contract's essential character, despite payment through an implementing agency...
Receipt of immovable property requires actual possession or enjoyment; redevelopment allotments exchanged for tenancy rights fall outside deemed incom...
Rejection of a rectification application under the GST enactment was affirmed as not satisfactory to rectify the order; the HC granted liberty to the petitioner to approach the Appellate Authority provided the petitioner deposits 50% of the disputed tax in cash from its electronic cash register within thirty days, and on such compliance the Appellate Authority must decide the appeal on merits without reference to limitation. Upon compliance the petitioners bank attachment shall be vacated and all recovery proceedings kept in abeyance. The petition is disposed of subject to these conditions.
Rejection of a rectification application under the GST enactment was affirmed as not satisfactory to rectify the order; the HC granted liberty to the petitioner to approach the Appellate Authority provided the petitioner deposits 50% of the disputed tax in cash from its electronic cash register within thirty days, and on such compliance the Appellate Authority must decide the appeal on merits without reference to limitation. Upon compliance the petitioners bank attachment shall be vacated and all recovery proceedings kept in abeyance. The petition is disposed of subject to these conditions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.