Religious purpose exclusion versus charitable purpose: non overriding religious objects do not attract Explanation 3, registration directed under sect...
Search-assessment proviso jurisdiction, time-barred valuation reports, and denial of cross-examination vitiate valuation-based and confession-based ad...
Proceeds of crime: provisional attachment confirmed; equivalent value attachment and acquisition date fair market value upheld, Covid exclusion preser...
Rejection of a rectification application under the GST enactment was affirmed as not satisfactory to rectify the order; the HC granted liberty to the petitioner to approach the Appellate Authority provided the petitioner deposits 50% of the disputed tax in cash from its electronic cash register within thirty days, and on such compliance the Appellate Authority must decide the appeal on merits without reference to limitation. Upon compliance the petitioners bank attachment shall be vacated and all recovery proceedings kept in abeyance. The petition is disposed of subject to these conditions.
Rejection of a rectification application under the GST enactment was affirmed as not satisfactory to rectify the order; the HC granted liberty to the petitioner to approach the Appellate Authority provided the petitioner deposits 50% of the disputed tax in cash from its electronic cash register within thirty days, and on such compliance the Appellate Authority must decide the appeal on merits without reference to limitation. Upon compliance the petitioners bank attachment shall be vacated and all recovery proceedings kept in abeyance. The petition is disposed of subject to these conditions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.