Restriction of Input Tax Credit under Rule 86A applies only to fraudulently or ineligible availed credit; mere wrongful recipient availment is insuffi...
Business reorganisation requires recognition of successor's modified return; draft orders against dissolved transferor quashed and fresh review direct...
Rejection of a rectification application under the GST enactment was affirmed as not satisfactory to rectify the order; the HC granted liberty to the petitioner to approach the Appellate Authority provided the petitioner deposits 50% of the disputed tax in cash from its electronic cash register within thirty days, and on such compliance the Appellate Authority must decide the appeal on merits without reference to limitation. Upon compliance the petitioners bank attachment shall be vacated and all recovery proceedings kept in abeyance. The petition is disposed of subject to these conditions.
Rejection of a rectification application under the GST enactment was affirmed as not satisfactory to rectify the order; the HC granted liberty to the petitioner to approach the Appellate Authority provided the petitioner deposits 50% of the disputed tax in cash from its electronic cash register within thirty days, and on such compliance the Appellate Authority must decide the appeal on merits without reference to limitation. Upon compliance the petitioners bank attachment shall be vacated and all recovery proceedings kept in abeyance. The petition is disposed of subject to these conditions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.