Revisionary jurisdiction under section 263 upheld; faceless assessments subject to revision when AO fails requisite enquiries, remitted for fresh asse...
Limited scope of processing under section 143(1): enhancement without show cause is unsustainable; remand for residency, taxation and TDS verification...
Rejection of a rectification application under the GST enactment was affirmed as not satisfactory to rectify the order; the HC granted liberty to the petitioner to approach the Appellate Authority provided the petitioner deposits 50% of the disputed tax in cash from its electronic cash register within thirty days, and on such compliance the Appellate Authority must decide the appeal on merits without reference to limitation. Upon compliance the petitioners bank attachment shall be vacated and all recovery proceedings kept in abeyance. The petition is disposed of subject to these conditions.
Rejection of a rectification application under the GST enactment was affirmed as not satisfactory to rectify the order; the HC granted liberty to the petitioner to approach the Appellate Authority provided the petitioner deposits 50% of the disputed tax in cash from its electronic cash register within thirty days, and on such compliance the Appellate Authority must decide the appeal on merits without reference to limitation. Upon compliance the petitioners bank attachment shall be vacated and all recovery proceedings kept in abeyance. The petition is disposed of subject to these conditions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.