Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Profiteering resulting from failure to pass on increased input tax credit ratio (0.43 percentage points) was quantified at Rs. 1,00,67,677; this finding was accepted and the benefit is to be refunded, apportioned pro rata to 340 home buyers, the respondent having acknowledged the contravention. The respondent is required to refund the profiteered amount to each eligible buyer and to pay interest on the refunded amounts under the applicable CGST rules. The DGAP investigation report is accepted and the proceedings are closed on the basis of the respondent's undertaking to comply with the refund and interest directions.
Profiteering resulting from failure to pass on increased input tax credit ratio (0.43 percentage points) was quantified at Rs. 1,00,67,677; this finding was accepted and the benefit is to be refunded, apportioned pro rata to 340 home buyers, the respondent having acknowledged the contravention. The respondent is required to refund the profiteered amount to each eligible buyer and to pay interest on the refunded amounts under the applicable CGST rules. The DGAP investigation report is accepted and the proceedings are closed on the basis of the respondent's undertaking to comply with the refund and interest directions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.