Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Capital reduction is distinct from share buy-back, preventing buy-back tax; restructuring interest and related business deductions also survive scruti...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
981 to 1000 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Profiteering resulting from failure to pass on increased input tax credit ratio (0.43 percentage points) was quantified at Rs. 1,00,67,677; this finding was accepted and the benefit is to be refunded, apportioned pro rata to 340 home buyers, the respondent having acknowledged the contravention. The respondent is required to refund the profiteered amount to each eligible buyer and to pay interest on the refunded amounts under the applicable CGST rules. The DGAP investigation report is accepted and the proceedings are closed on the basis of the respondent's undertaking to comply with the refund and interest directions.
Profiteering resulting from failure to pass on increased input tax credit ratio (0.43 percentage points) was quantified at Rs. 1,00,67,677; this finding was accepted and the benefit is to be refunded, apportioned pro rata to 340 home buyers, the respondent having acknowledged the contravention. The respondent is required to refund the profiteered amount to each eligible buyer and to pay interest on the refunded amounts under the applicable CGST rules. The DGAP investigation report is accepted and the proceedings are closed on the basis of the respondent's undertaking to comply with the refund and interest directions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.