Scope of intermediary status for data hosting services: tribunal finds provider not intermediary, services exported and not taxable, limited remand on...
CENVAT credit availability after omission of Rule 12B in textiles confirmed; late addendum to SCN introducing new grounds held time-barred and invalid...
Export of Wheat Flour and related products subject to online allocation, eligibility criteria, non-transferable six-month authorisations and reporting...
Profiteering resulting from failure to pass on increased input tax credit ratio (0.43 percentage points) was quantified at Rs. 1,00,67,677; this finding was accepted and the benefit is to be refunded, apportioned pro rata to 340 home buyers, the respondent having acknowledged the contravention. The respondent is required to refund the profiteered amount to each eligible buyer and to pay interest on the refunded amounts under the applicable CGST rules. The DGAP investigation report is accepted and the proceedings are closed on the basis of the respondent's undertaking to comply with the refund and interest directions.
Profiteering resulting from failure to pass on increased input tax credit ratio (0.43 percentage points) was quantified at Rs. 1,00,67,677; this finding was accepted and the benefit is to be refunded, apportioned pro rata to 340 home buyers, the respondent having acknowledged the contravention. The respondent is required to refund the profiteered amount to each eligible buyer and to pay interest on the refunded amounts under the applicable CGST rules. The DGAP investigation report is accepted and the proceedings are closed on the basis of the respondent's undertaking to comply with the refund and interest directions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.