Misdeclaration of quantity rejected where supplier evidence established counting errors, so reassessment, confiscation and redemption fine were set as...
Admissibility of electronic evidence controls valuation and penalty exposure; non compliant e records and statements nullify revaluation and penalties...
Addition under section 40A(3) challenged on facts showing freight payments were not made in cash to a single driver exceeding the statutory limit, and the appellate authority found records and affidavits supporting that payments were direct to drivers, resulting in deletion of the addition. Addition for alleged unrecorded cash payment based on mobile messages was deleted because the messages were unauthenticated, no verification or enquiry was made of the purported recipients, books were not rejected, and there was no corroborative evidence, leading to deletion.
Addition under section 40A(3) challenged on facts showing freight payments were not made in cash to a single driver exceeding the statutory limit, and the appellate authority found records and affidavits supporting that payments were direct to drivers, resulting in deletion of the addition. Addition for alleged unrecorded cash payment based on mobile messages was deleted because the messages were unauthenticated, no verification or enquiry was made of the purported recipients, books were not rejected, and there was no corroborative evidence, leading to deletion.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4816 
Join Channel 
