Timing mismatch in income recognition requires verification whether receipts were already taxed in an earlier year; matter remitted for fresh examinat...
FOB transaction value and export incentives: customs valuation cannot override contractual export benefits or support confiscation without valid proof...
Addition under section 40A(3) challenged on facts showing freight payments were not made in cash to a single driver exceeding the statutory limit, and the appellate authority found records and affidavits supporting that payments were direct to drivers, resulting in deletion of the addition. Addition for alleged unrecorded cash payment based on mobile messages was deleted because the messages were unauthenticated, no verification or enquiry was made of the purported recipients, books were not rejected, and there was no corroborative evidence, leading to deletion.
Addition under section 40A(3) challenged on facts showing freight payments were not made in cash to a single driver exceeding the statutory limit, and the appellate authority found records and affidavits supporting that payments were direct to drivers, resulting in deletion of the addition. Addition for alleged unrecorded cash payment based on mobile messages was deleted because the messages were unauthenticated, no verification or enquiry was made of the purported recipients, books were not rejected, and there was no corroborative evidence, leading to deletion.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
