Unlawful outward remittances via Hawala using proforma invoices and electronic records proved; documents admitted, directors penalised, penalties redu...
Attachment of equivalent-value properties as proceeds of crime upheld; preventive attachment order and confirmation sustained; no independent ED reinv...
Broker trading-system "technical glitch" redefinition and narrowed incident-reporting regime for large IBT/STWT brokers requiring 2-hr notice and 14-w...
Discussions address TDS obligations for rental and professional service payments where failure to deduct on provision led to assessment under withholding liability. For rent, absence of recipient declarations or proof of taxability and no evidence of payment despite provision, combined with a bank assessees access to expert advice, meant the proviso conditions were not satisfied and withholding liability was upheld, resulting in default treatment. For legal and consultation fees, part payment on which TDS was shown to be deducted may relieve the assessee for that portion; the remainder is remitted to the TDS assessing officer for verification and adjustment. Appeal partly allowed accordingly.
Discussions address TDS obligations for rental and professional service payments where failure to deduct on provision led to assessment under withholding liability. For rent, absence of recipient declarations or proof of taxability and no evidence of payment despite provision, combined with a bank assessees access to expert advice, meant the proviso conditions were not satisfied and withholding liability was upheld, resulting in default treatment. For legal and consultation fees, part payment on which TDS was shown to be deducted may relieve the assessee for that portion; the remainder is remitted to the TDS assessing officer for verification and adjustment. Appeal partly allowed accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.