Revisionary jurisdiction under section 263 upheld; faceless assessments subject to revision when AO fails requisite enquiries, remitted for fresh asse...
Limited scope of processing under section 143(1): enhancement without show cause is unsustainable; remand for residency, taxation and TDS verification...
ITAT addressed penalty under the Income-tax regime where an assessee, during search proceedings, admitted undisclosed income, explained the manner and source of accrual, and included the disclosure in the return with taxes and interest paid; the assessing officer and appellate authority acknowledged the disclosure. Applying the principle that a voluntary, explained disclosure during search accepted by revenue officers and regularised by return and tax payment negates penal liability, the tribunal found the statutory criteria satisfied and set aside the penalty, allowing the appeal.
ITAT addressed penalty under the Income-tax regime where an assessee, during search proceedings, admitted undisclosed income, explained the manner and source of accrual, and included the disclosure in the return with taxes and interest paid; the assessing officer and appellate authority acknowledged the disclosure. Applying the principle that a voluntary, explained disclosure during search accepted by revenue officers and regularised by return and tax payment negates penal liability, the tribunal found the statutory criteria satisfied and set aside the penalty, allowing the appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.