NPCI-based bank account validation for IEC applications and modifications enables real-time validation; incorrect details block submission or trigger ...
Creation/Invocation of pledge of securities through depository system: standardized pledge forms, notice requirement and invocation notifications to p...
Calendar Spread margin benefit for Single Stock Derivatives suspended on expiry day for expiring contracts; exchanges must implement systems and rule ...
Proportionate interest, unexplained credits and partner remuneration disputed; proofs of fund nexus and lender identity were decisive and disallowance...
Capital gains valuation from stamp assessment versus net consideration for residential reinvestment: deemed stamp value replaced for gains but not for...
Challenge to imposition of Minimum Import Price conditions for...
Minimum Import Price restrictions for Black Pepper, Areca-nuts and Apples upheld; procedural laying failure not fatal, notifications to be placed before Parliament
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Challenge to imposition of Minimum Import Price conditions for Black Pepper, Areca-nuts and Apples under the FTDR Act is addressed on substance: instruments titled notifications are treated as delegated legislation imposing import restrictions traceable to subsection (2) of Section 3, and validity is assessed by substance over form; nomenclature mismatch does not invalidate them. The statutory requirement to lay delegated legislation before Parliament under Section 19(3) is held directory, not mandatory, and non-compliance does not per se vitiate the notifications. Government is directed to place existing notifications before Parliament and petitioners may file objections within two weeks for hearing and further orders.
Challenge to imposition of Minimum Import Price conditions for Black Pepper, Areca-nuts and Apples under the FTDR Act is addressed on substance: instruments titled notifications are treated as delegated legislation imposing import restrictions traceable to subsection (2) of Section 3, and validity is assessed by substance over form; nomenclature mismatch does not invalidate them. The statutory requirement to lay delegated legislation before Parliament under Section 19(3) is held directory, not mandatory, and non-compliance does not per se vitiate the notifications. Government is directed to place existing notifications before Parliament and petitioners may file objections within two weeks for hearing and further orders.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.