Retrospective application of beneficial circulars upheld, binding officers and granting post adjudication relief where adjudication occurred after cir...
Admissibility of Investigation Statements requires witness examination before the adjudicating authority; otherwise statements cannot sustain a penalt...
Transaction value and connected person treatment in excise valuation: proprietary concerns not inter connected undertakings, relief on valuation and c...
Appointment of Registrars as adjudicating officers under Companies Act reallocates territorial jurisdiction and sets appeal route to Regional Director...
Composite supply of drilling services and site specific chemicals characterised as composite supply; prior advance rulings set aside, tax rate left op...
Transaction value rules for related persons require that...
Transaction value between related persons requires market-equivalent pricing; importer must prove declared value mirrors ordinary international trade price.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Transaction value rules for related persons require that declared invoice value be accepted only if the relationship did not influence price; the relevant valuation standard is the price at which such or like goods are ordinarily sold for delivery at time and place of importation, not merely the actual inter-party price. The importer bears the burden of proving declared value closely approximates contemporaneous market comparators and that discounts do not reflect relationship-driven pricing; absence of profit element or inability to show cost recovery supports rejection of the declared value under the valuation rules.
Transaction value rules for related persons require that declared invoice value be accepted only if the relationship did not influence price; the relevant valuation standard is the price at which such or like goods are ordinarily sold for delivery at time and place of importation, not merely the actual inter-party price. The importer bears the burden of proving declared value closely approximates contemporaneous market comparators and that discounts do not reflect relationship-driven pricing; absence of profit element or inability to show cost recovery supports rejection of the declared value under the valuation rules.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.