Co-operative society's mandatory reserve and share capital fixed deposits with banks-interest treated as business income under 80P(2)(a)(iii) deductio...
Income tax reassessment reopening after four years on investigation tip, without s.147 proviso disclosure failure, struck down as borrowed satisfactio...
Issue concerns smuggling allegations of gold, applicability of statutory specified area designation, and the burden of proof on revenue to establish foreign origin. The tribunal found absence of foreign markings, recovery outside customs or specified areas, and documentary records of lawful possession including tax returns and auditor certificate, which were not impugned by the revenue; on that evidentiary basis the revenue failed to produce positive evidence of foreign origin. The analysis addressed provisional release, seizure and confiscation of conveyance and accessories, and comparative purity as factual indicators of origin.
Issue concerns smuggling allegations of gold, applicability of statutory specified area designation, and the burden of proof on revenue to establish foreign origin. The tribunal found absence of foreign markings, recovery outside customs or specified areas, and documentary records of lawful possession including tax returns and auditor certificate, which were not impugned by the revenue; on that evidentiary basis the revenue failed to produce positive evidence of foreign origin. The analysis addressed provisional release, seizure and confiscation of conveyance and accessories, and comparative purity as factual indicators of origin.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.