Mis-declaration and Concealment: confiscation affirmed, transaction value re-determined and mandatory penalty sustained; redemption allowed on payment...
Page of 4821
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
5761 to 5780 of 96408 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Issue concerns smuggling allegations of gold, applicability of statutory specified area designation, and the burden of proof on revenue to establish foreign origin. The tribunal found absence of foreign markings, recovery outside customs or specified areas, and documentary records of lawful possession including tax returns and auditor certificate, which were not impugned by the revenue; on that evidentiary basis the revenue failed to produce positive evidence of foreign origin. The analysis addressed provisional release, seizure and confiscation of conveyance and accessories, and comparative purity as factual indicators of origin.
Issue concerns smuggling allegations of gold, applicability of statutory specified area designation, and the burden of proof on revenue to establish foreign origin. The tribunal found absence of foreign markings, recovery outside customs or specified areas, and documentary records of lawful possession including tax returns and auditor certificate, which were not impugned by the revenue; on that evidentiary basis the revenue failed to produce positive evidence of foreign origin. The analysis addressed provisional release, seizure and confiscation of conveyance and accessories, and comparative purity as factual indicators of origin.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.