Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Residuary jurisdiction under insolvency does not permit an adjudicating authority to declare title to a trademark where the question of ownership is not in relation to insolvency proceedings; accordingly the adjudicating authoritys declaration of trademark ownership was set aside because the approved resolution plan and related insolvency process could not determine trademark title. Findings that the assignment fell within avoidance provisions on preferential or undervalued transactions were held perverse and beyond the scope of the approval inquiry, and such statutory avoidance actions require specific pleading and timely forensic scrutiny by the resolution professional. Observations do not bind other fora deciding title on merits.
Residuary jurisdiction under insolvency does not permit an adjudicating authority to declare title to a trademark where the question of ownership is not in relation to insolvency proceedings; accordingly the adjudicating authoritys declaration of trademark ownership was set aside because the approved resolution plan and related insolvency process could not determine trademark title. Findings that the assignment fell within avoidance provisions on preferential or undervalued transactions were held perverse and beyond the scope of the approval inquiry, and such statutory avoidance actions require specific pleading and timely forensic scrutiny by the resolution professional. Observations do not bind other fora deciding title on merits.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.