Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Assessment orders passed under the GST scheme in respect of periods including March, April, June and July 2023 are set aside and the affected taxpayer is permitted to have belated returns taken on record; authorities are permitted to examine and adjudicate liability thereafter under the applicable assessment provisions (including proceedings under substantive assessment provisions) in accordance with law. All other contentions remain open. The taxpayer is directed to pay Rs.25,000 to the High Court Legal Services Authority as costs.
Assessment orders passed under the GST scheme in respect of periods including March, April, June and July 2023 are set aside and the affected taxpayer is permitted to have belated returns taken on record; authorities are permitted to examine and adjudicate liability thereafter under the applicable assessment provisions (including proceedings under substantive assessment provisions) in accordance with law. All other contentions remain open. The taxpayer is directed to pay Rs.25,000 to the High Court Legal Services Authority as costs.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4790
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
