Proceeds of crime and money laundering: PMLA prosecution requires subsisting predicate offence; discharge of predicate accused precludes further prose...
Validity of faceless assessment procedure challenged for jurisdictional AO intervention mid-remand, resulting in quashing of assessment for procedural...
Reconciliation statement dispute regarding an extended period of limitation under section 74 was not addressed by the adjudicating authority, which recorded perfunctory observations; the authority is directed to re-examine the limitation contention and the assertion of having supplied the reconciliation statement and to afford the petitioner an opportunity of hearing before passing a fresh order. The adjudicating authority must deal substantively with the limitation issue and factual assertions and issue a reconsidered order within twelve weeks from receipt of the direction.
Reconciliation statement dispute regarding an extended period of limitation under section 74 was not addressed by the adjudicating authority, which recorded perfunctory observations; the authority is directed to re-examine the limitation contention and the assertion of having supplied the reconciliation statement and to afford the petitioner an opportunity of hearing before passing a fresh order. The adjudicating authority must deal substantively with the limitation issue and factual assertions and issue a reconsidered order within twelve weeks from receipt of the direction.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
