Retrospective application of beneficial circulars upheld, binding officers and granting post adjudication relief where adjudication occurred after cir...
Admissibility of Investigation Statements requires witness examination before the adjudicating authority; otherwise statements cannot sustain a penalt...
Transaction value and connected person treatment in excise valuation: proprietary concerns not inter connected undertakings, relief on valuation and c...
Reconciliation statement dispute regarding an extended period of limitation under section 74 was not addressed by the adjudicating authority, which recorded perfunctory observations; the authority is directed to re-examine the limitation contention and the assertion of having supplied the reconciliation statement and to afford the petitioner an opportunity of hearing before passing a fresh order. The adjudicating authority must deal substantively with the limitation issue and factual assertions and issue a reconsidered order within twelve weeks from receipt of the direction.
Reconciliation statement dispute regarding an extended period of limitation under section 74 was not addressed by the adjudicating authority, which recorded perfunctory observations; the authority is directed to re-examine the limitation contention and the assertion of having supplied the reconciliation statement and to afford the petitioner an opportunity of hearing before passing a fresh order. The adjudicating authority must deal substantively with the limitation issue and factual assertions and issue a reconsidered order within twelve weeks from receipt of the direction.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
