Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Reconciliation statement dispute regarding an extended period of limitation under section 74 was not addressed by the adjudicating authority, which recorded perfunctory observations; the authority is directed to re-examine the limitation contention and the assertion of having supplied the reconciliation statement and to afford the petitioner an opportunity of hearing before passing a fresh order. The adjudicating authority must deal substantively with the limitation issue and factual assertions and issue a reconsidered order within twelve weeks from receipt of the direction.
Reconciliation statement dispute regarding an extended period of limitation under section 74 was not addressed by the adjudicating authority, which recorded perfunctory observations; the authority is directed to re-examine the limitation contention and the assertion of having supplied the reconciliation statement and to afford the petitioner an opportunity of hearing before passing a fresh order. The adjudicating authority must deal substantively with the limitation issue and factual assertions and issue a reconsidered order within twelve weeks from receipt of the direction.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.