Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Reopening an income-tax assessment on the same factual material already forming the subject of consideration before the appellate authority was impermissible where additions originated from digital data seized during a search and used under the separate statutory provision dealing with search-derived material. The reasoning rested on the bar against initiating reassessment proceedings based on identical seized material that was under appellate scrutiny, and consequently the reopening notice was quashed, preventing further reassessment on that same material.
Reopening an income-tax assessment on the same factual material already forming the subject of consideration before the appellate authority was impermissible where additions originated from digital data seized during a search and used under the separate statutory provision dealing with search-derived material. The reasoning rested on the bar against initiating reassessment proceedings based on identical seized material that was under appellate scrutiny, and consequently the reopening notice was quashed, preventing further reassessment on that same material.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.