Imported analyser diagnostic cartridges treated as accessories with analyser system, not standalone diagnostic reagents; extended limitation and penal...
Steel-timber construction shuttering/formwork tariff classification dispute: essential character held steel, classified as shuttering under Heading 73...
Family-linked property purchases using fabricated loan agreements and benami-style arrangements held to be crime proceeds; attachment upheld, appeal d...
Reopening an income-tax assessment on the same factual material already forming the subject of consideration before the appellate authority was impermissible where additions originated from digital data seized during a search and used under the separate statutory provision dealing with search-derived material. The reasoning rested on the bar against initiating reassessment proceedings based on identical seized material that was under appellate scrutiny, and consequently the reopening notice was quashed, preventing further reassessment on that same material.
Reopening an income-tax assessment on the same factual material already forming the subject of consideration before the appellate authority was impermissible where additions originated from digital data seized during a search and used under the separate statutory provision dealing with search-derived material. The reasoning rested on the bar against initiating reassessment proceedings based on identical seized material that was under appellate scrutiny, and consequently the reopening notice was quashed, preventing further reassessment on that same material.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.