Scope of intermediary status for data hosting services: tribunal finds provider not intermediary, services exported and not taxable, limited remand on...
CENVAT credit availability after omission of Rule 12B in textiles confirmed; late addendum to SCN introducing new grounds held time-barred and invalid...
Export of Wheat Flour and related products subject to online allocation, eligibility criteria, non-transferable six-month authorisations and reporting...
Reopening an income-tax assessment on the same factual material already forming the subject of consideration before the appellate authority was impermissible where additions originated from digital data seized during a search and used under the separate statutory provision dealing with search-derived material. The reasoning rested on the bar against initiating reassessment proceedings based on identical seized material that was under appellate scrutiny, and consequently the reopening notice was quashed, preventing further reassessment on that same material.
Reopening an income-tax assessment on the same factual material already forming the subject of consideration before the appellate authority was impermissible where additions originated from digital data seized during a search and used under the separate statutory provision dealing with search-derived material. The reasoning rested on the bar against initiating reassessment proceedings based on identical seized material that was under appellate scrutiny, and consequently the reopening notice was quashed, preventing further reassessment on that same material.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4813 
Join Channel 
