Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Mis-declaration and undervaluation findings premised on email printouts and statements recorded under statutory witness-examination provisions were held inadmissible where procedural safeguards for electronic evidence and witness statements were not observed. The adjudicator failed to record compliance with the requirement for certification of electronic records and to document a panchnama for seized printouts, and did not provide or secure opportunity for effective cross-examination after statements were retracted. For these reasons the re-determination of transaction value and attendant penalties founded on those materials could not be sustained, and the impugned valuation and penalty measures were set aside.
Mis-declaration and undervaluation findings premised on email printouts and statements recorded under statutory witness-examination provisions were held inadmissible where procedural safeguards for electronic evidence and witness statements were not observed. The adjudicator failed to record compliance with the requirement for certification of electronic records and to document a panchnama for seized printouts, and did not provide or secure opportunity for effective cross-examination after statements were retracted. For these reasons the re-determination of transaction value and attendant penalties founded on those materials could not be sustained, and the impugned valuation and penalty measures were set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.