Attachment and proclamation of sale of immovable property: limitation treated from financial year end; proclamation held within period, petition dismi...
Second Schedule attachment and validity of a post-notice mortgage: TRO cannot declare mortgage void ab initio; sale and appropriation allowed thereaft...
Limitation for final assessment under sections 144C and 153 treated jointly, resulting in quashing of timebarred assessment order and liberty to reviv...
Deductibility of settlement payments for securities law penalties and treatment of unexplained cash credits in share trading -- Tribunal upholds posit...
Threshold for allottee-initiated insolvency petitions in leasehold real estate upheld; petition admitted after possession letters deemed legally ineff...
Page of 4814
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
6541 to 6560 of 96262 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Mis-declaration and undervaluation findings premised on email printouts and statements recorded under statutory witness-examination provisions were held inadmissible where procedural safeguards for electronic evidence and witness statements were not observed. The adjudicator failed to record compliance with the requirement for certification of electronic records and to document a panchnama for seized printouts, and did not provide or secure opportunity for effective cross-examination after statements were retracted. For these reasons the re-determination of transaction value and attendant penalties founded on those materials could not be sustained, and the impugned valuation and penalty measures were set aside.
Mis-declaration and undervaluation findings premised on email printouts and statements recorded under statutory witness-examination provisions were held inadmissible where procedural safeguards for electronic evidence and witness statements were not observed. The adjudicator failed to record compliance with the requirement for certification of electronic records and to document a panchnama for seized printouts, and did not provide or secure opportunity for effective cross-examination after statements were retracted. For these reasons the re-determination of transaction value and attendant penalties founded on those materials could not be sustained, and the impugned valuation and penalty measures were set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.