Transfer pricing comparables selection and working capital adjustment u/r 10B(1)(e)(iii), remanded for recomputation with rejected comparables include...
Company oppression/mismanagement petition amendments and maintainability after alleged share transfer and forgery claims; tribunal order quashed for l...
Applicability of admissibility rules for investigation statements and electronic records in customs valuation is examined: statements recorded under interrogation provisions cannot be relied upon for rejecting declared transaction value where the certificate and procedural safeguards for electronic records were not complied with, and where statements were retracted; absence of a panchnama for email printouts and noncompliance with the certificate requirement for investigative statements rendered reliance on such material improper, making re-determination of value under valuation rules and consequent penalties unsustainable, resulting in setting aside the valuation rejection and penalty imposition.
Applicability of admissibility rules for investigation statements and electronic records in customs valuation is examined: statements recorded under interrogation provisions cannot be relied upon for rejecting declared transaction value where the certificate and procedural safeguards for electronic records were not complied with, and where statements were retracted; absence of a panchnama for email printouts and noncompliance with the certificate requirement for investigative statements rendered reliance on such material improper, making re-determination of value under valuation rules and consequent penalties unsustainable, resulting in setting aside the valuation rejection and penalty imposition.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
