Revisionary jurisdiction under section 263 upheld; faceless assessments subject to revision when AO fails requisite enquiries, remitted for fresh asse...
Limited scope of processing under section 143(1): enhancement without show cause is unsustainable; remand for residency, taxation and TDS verification...
Applicability of admissibility rules for investigation statements and electronic records in customs valuation is examined: statements recorded under interrogation provisions cannot be relied upon for rejecting declared transaction value where the certificate and procedural safeguards for electronic records were not complied with, and where statements were retracted; absence of a panchnama for email printouts and noncompliance with the certificate requirement for investigative statements rendered reliance on such material improper, making re-determination of value under valuation rules and consequent penalties unsustainable, resulting in setting aside the valuation rejection and penalty imposition.
Applicability of admissibility rules for investigation statements and electronic records in customs valuation is examined: statements recorded under interrogation provisions cannot be relied upon for rejecting declared transaction value where the certificate and procedural safeguards for electronic records were not complied with, and where statements were retracted; absence of a panchnama for email printouts and noncompliance with the certificate requirement for investigative statements rendered reliance on such material improper, making re-determination of value under valuation rules and consequent penalties unsustainable, resulting in setting aside the valuation rejection and penalty imposition.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
