Attachment and proclamation of sale of immovable property: limitation treated from financial year end; proclamation held within period, petition dismi...
Second Schedule attachment and validity of a post-notice mortgage: TRO cannot declare mortgage void ab initio; sale and appropriation allowed thereaft...
Limitation for final assessment under sections 144C and 153 treated jointly, resulting in quashing of timebarred assessment order and liberty to reviv...
Deductibility of settlement payments for securities law penalties and treatment of unexplained cash credits in share trading -- Tribunal upholds posit...
Threshold for allottee-initiated insolvency petitions in leasehold real estate upheld; petition admitted after possession letters deemed legally ineff...
Page of 4814
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
6541 to 6560 of 96262 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Classification of imported lauric acid and entitlement to concessional duty under the relevant customs notification was contested; review under the reassessment provision permits Revenue to examine short levy and correctness of classification, with burden of proof on the importer. The imported lauric acid was not held to fall within the claimed chapter sub-heading and thus did not qualify for the claimed concessional exemption; reliance on coordinate precedent supported that classification denial. Consequently, the impugned orders sustaining differential duty were upheld and the appeals dismissed.
Classification of imported lauric acid and entitlement to concessional duty under the relevant customs notification was contested; review under the reassessment provision permits Revenue to examine short levy and correctness of classification, with burden of proof on the importer. The imported lauric acid was not held to fall within the claimed chapter sub-heading and thus did not qualify for the claimed concessional exemption; reliance on coordinate precedent supported that classification denial. Consequently, the impugned orders sustaining differential duty were upheld and the appeals dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.