Benami transaction and beneficial ownership: documentary and circumstantial evidence show payors were true beneficiaries, resulting in PBPTA consequen...
Denial of Preferential Treatment under SAFTA overturned where unchallenged Country of Origin certificate warranted exemption under Notification benefi...
Dispute concerns whether a settlement resolution applicant (SRA) qualified as a related party and thus was ineligible to submit a resolution plan. The tribunal noted the alleged transaction rested on a non-binding term sheet and no definitive contract or allotment of shares occurred, meaning the factual elements underpinning related party attribution were absent, yet the SRA was treated as a related party. The adjudicating authority previously considered and rejected the ineligibility challenge, rendering that determination final and permitting approval of the resolution plan; accordingly the appellate challenge to that approval was dismissed.
Dispute concerns whether a settlement resolution applicant (SRA) qualified as a related party and thus was ineligible to submit a resolution plan. The tribunal noted the alleged transaction rested on a non-binding term sheet and no definitive contract or allotment of shares occurred, meaning the factual elements underpinning related party attribution were absent, yet the SRA was treated as a related party. The adjudicating authority previously considered and rejected the ineligibility challenge, rendering that determination final and permitting approval of the resolution plan; accordingly the appellate challenge to that approval was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
