Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Interim finance raised during CIRP from a related party and concurrent appointment of related legal counsel created a conflict of interest and breached the fiduciary duty and transparency obligations of the resolution professional, warranting corrective action. The RP failed to place terms of the loan and CIRP costs before the CoC for informed approval, and appropriated interim funds largely for his own and the related lawyers fees, justifying reduction of fees recoverable. The Appellate Tribunal upheld findings of misuse, disallowed certain interim finance refunds for interest and processing fees, and moderated the RPs recovery to Rs. 50 lakhs.
Interim finance raised during CIRP from a related party and concurrent appointment of related legal counsel created a conflict of interest and breached the fiduciary duty and transparency obligations of the resolution professional, warranting corrective action. The RP failed to place terms of the loan and CIRP costs before the CoC for informed approval, and appropriated interim funds largely for his own and the related lawyers fees, justifying reduction of fees recoverable. The Appellate Tribunal upheld findings of misuse, disallowed certain interim finance refunds for interest and processing fees, and moderated the RPs recovery to Rs. 50 lakhs.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
