Misdeclaration of quantity rejected where supplier evidence established counting errors, so reassessment, confiscation and redemption fine were set as...
Admissibility of electronic evidence controls valuation and penalty exposure; non compliant e records and statements nullify revaluation and penalties...
Interim finance raised during CIRP from a related party and concurrent appointment of related legal counsel created a conflict of interest and breached the fiduciary duty and transparency obligations of the resolution professional, warranting corrective action. The RP failed to place terms of the loan and CIRP costs before the CoC for informed approval, and appropriated interim funds largely for his own and the related lawyers fees, justifying reduction of fees recoverable. The Appellate Tribunal upheld findings of misuse, disallowed certain interim finance refunds for interest and processing fees, and moderated the RPs recovery to Rs. 50 lakhs.
Interim finance raised during CIRP from a related party and concurrent appointment of related legal counsel created a conflict of interest and breached the fiduciary duty and transparency obligations of the resolution professional, warranting corrective action. The RP failed to place terms of the loan and CIRP costs before the CoC for informed approval, and appropriated interim funds largely for his own and the related lawyers fees, justifying reduction of fees recoverable. The Appellate Tribunal upheld findings of misuse, disallowed certain interim finance refunds for interest and processing fees, and moderated the RPs recovery to Rs. 50 lakhs.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
