Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4827
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
141 to 160 of 96536 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The note addresses attachment of property under the PMLA where a...
Money laundering property attachment and third-party encumbrance rights clarified; prior bona fide interests enforceable before confiscation, appeals dismissed
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
The note addresses attachment of property under the PMLA where a bank asserted a prior bonafide encumbrance. It clarifies that a prior legitimate third-party interest permits enforcement of that interest ahead of PMLA attachment, with only the residue available for confiscation. It further clarifies jurisdiction: both the Appellate Tribunal and the Special Court may entertain claims by bonafide third parties, but once the confirming attachment order is final, confiscation ordered, or trial under the PMLA has commenced, adjudication of such third-party claims becomes the Special Courts domain. The appeals were dismissed.
The note addresses attachment of property under the PMLA where a bank asserted a prior bonafide encumbrance. It clarifies that a prior legitimate third-party interest permits enforcement of that interest ahead of PMLA attachment, with only the residue available for confiscation. It further clarifies jurisdiction: both the Appellate Tribunal and the Special Court may entertain claims by bonafide third parties, but once the confirming attachment order is final, confiscation ordered, or trial under the PMLA has commenced, adjudication of such third-party claims becomes the Special Courts domain. The appeals were dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.