Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Page of 4826
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
81 to 100 of 96510 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The note addresses attachment of property under the PMLA where a...
Money laundering property attachment and third-party encumbrance rights clarified; prior bona fide interests enforceable before confiscation, appeals dismissed
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
The note addresses attachment of property under the PMLA where a bank asserted a prior bonafide encumbrance. It clarifies that a prior legitimate third-party interest permits enforcement of that interest ahead of PMLA attachment, with only the residue available for confiscation. It further clarifies jurisdiction: both the Appellate Tribunal and the Special Court may entertain claims by bonafide third parties, but once the confirming attachment order is final, confiscation ordered, or trial under the PMLA has commenced, adjudication of such third-party claims becomes the Special Courts domain. The appeals were dismissed.
The note addresses attachment of property under the PMLA where a bank asserted a prior bonafide encumbrance. It clarifies that a prior legitimate third-party interest permits enforcement of that interest ahead of PMLA attachment, with only the residue available for confiscation. It further clarifies jurisdiction: both the Appellate Tribunal and the Special Court may entertain claims by bonafide third parties, but once the confirming attachment order is final, confiscation ordered, or trial under the PMLA has commenced, adjudication of such third-party claims becomes the Special Courts domain. The appeals were dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.