Service of notice and contractual debt acknowledgment preserved insolvency admission against a corporate guarantor despite limitation and natural just...
Original works exemption excludes standalone boulder transportation, leaving subcontracted railway-project transport services subject to service tax l...
Annual production capacity determinations excluding stenter galleries support refunds for unconstitutional excise levies without an unjust-enrichment ...
Vicarious liability for cheque dishonour requires specific allegations of responsibility and cheque signatory; generic director allegations cannot sus...
IT Resilience Index requires market infrastructure institutions to automate resilience scoring, early warnings, and continuous service-delivery monito...
The note addresses attachment of property under the PMLA where a...
Money laundering property attachment and third-party encumbrance rights clarified; prior bona fide interests enforceable before confiscation, appeals dismissed
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
The note addresses attachment of property under the PMLA where a bank asserted a prior bonafide encumbrance. It clarifies that a prior legitimate third-party interest permits enforcement of that interest ahead of PMLA attachment, with only the residue available for confiscation. It further clarifies jurisdiction: both the Appellate Tribunal and the Special Court may entertain claims by bonafide third parties, but once the confirming attachment order is final, confiscation ordered, or trial under the PMLA has commenced, adjudication of such third-party claims becomes the Special Courts domain. The appeals were dismissed.
The note addresses attachment of property under the PMLA where a bank asserted a prior bonafide encumbrance. It clarifies that a prior legitimate third-party interest permits enforcement of that interest ahead of PMLA attachment, with only the residue available for confiscation. It further clarifies jurisdiction: both the Appellate Tribunal and the Special Court may entertain claims by bonafide third parties, but once the confirming attachment order is final, confiscation ordered, or trial under the PMLA has commenced, adjudication of such third-party claims becomes the Special Courts domain. The appeals were dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.