Employee recoveries, input tax credit and notice pay recovery under GST: AAR distinguishes taxable supplies from non-taxable perquisites and penalties...
Liberal construction of sufficient cause justifies condonation of inordinate delay where criminal proceedings and jail confinement explained the defau...
Page of 4826
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
5041 to 5060 of 96510 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Addresses bail in an alleged wrongful utilisation of input tax credit, noting non-compliance with the mandatory prior sanction requirement and the special statute regime. Discusses classification under the statute of cognizable/non-cognizable and bailable/non-bailable offences and observes custodial interrogation was not necessary. Notes alleged wrongful GST returns causing significant loss and that offences may attract sentencing up to five years while compounding remains available, affecting prosecutorial prospects. Considers co-accused anticipatory bail and the impact of continued detention on the accused's business, resulting in grant of regular bail under the special procedure provisions.
Addresses bail in an alleged wrongful utilisation of input tax credit, noting non-compliance with the mandatory prior sanction requirement and the special statute regime. Discusses classification under the statute of cognizable/non-cognizable and bailable/non-bailable offences and observes custodial interrogation was not necessary. Notes alleged wrongful GST returns causing significant loss and that offences may attract sentencing up to five years while compounding remains available, affecting prosecutorial prospects. Considers co-accused anticipatory bail and the impact of continued detention on the accused's business, resulting in grant of regular bail under the special procedure provisions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.