Admission of additional evidence under remand rules must await a meaningful remand report; failure to do so breaches natural justice and mandates rema...
Export Obligation Discharge Certificates for EPCG compliance cannot be questioned by Customs unless DGFT adjudicates and cancels them, so demands quas...
Entitlement to regular bail is examined in light of necessity and proportionality of arrest, custodial interrogation, and prima facie material. The court finds absence of evidence of any overt agreement or common design to sustain criminal conspiracy, so mere communication or association does not establish conspiracy; accordingly, no incriminating recovery or summons linked to the applicant was recorded, negating the need for custodial interrogation and rendering the arrest mechanical and lacking statutory satisfaction, violating Article 21 and amounting to punitive pre-trial detention, therefore continued incarceration is unjustified and bail is granted subject to conditions.
Entitlement to regular bail is examined in light of necessity and proportionality of arrest, custodial interrogation, and prima facie material. The court finds absence of evidence of any overt agreement or common design to sustain criminal conspiracy, so mere communication or association does not establish conspiracy; accordingly, no incriminating recovery or summons linked to the applicant was recorded, negating the need for custodial interrogation and rendering the arrest mechanical and lacking statutory satisfaction, violating Article 21 and amounting to punitive pre-trial detention, therefore continued incarceration is unjustified and bail is granted subject to conditions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.