Classification of imported salvaged shaft pieces as ship parts confirmed, reassessment time-barred and appeal allowed restoring original classificatio...
Scope of intermediary status for data hosting services: tribunal finds provider not intermediary, services exported and not taxable, limited remand on...
CENVAT credit availability after omission of Rule 12B in textiles confirmed; late addendum to SCN introducing new grounds held time-barred and invalid...
Export of Wheat Flour and related products subject to online allocation, eligibility criteria, non-transferable six-month authorisations and reporting...
Page of 4811
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
6881 to 6900 of 96208 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The text addresses revision jurisdiction over income-tax assessments concerning professional and technical fees, sundry creditors, notional interest under Ind AS, and stock valuation. On the alleged difference for professional and technical fees, the record shows AO queries, assessee replies and supporting documents, therefore the revisional finding was contrary to record and unsustainable. On addition of sundry creditors, a debit (trade receivable) was shown and incorporated in P&L, so the revisional addition was factually incorrect and unsustainable. On notional interest, reconciliation with Form 26AS and balance sheet showed no variation, so the revisional action was unwarranted. On stock valuation, AO failed adequate inquiry into valuation method and consistency, so the revisional concern is upheld.
The text addresses revision jurisdiction over income-tax assessments concerning professional and technical fees, sundry creditors, notional interest under Ind AS, and stock valuation. On the alleged difference for professional and technical fees, the record shows AO queries, assessee replies and supporting documents, therefore the revisional finding was contrary to record and unsustainable. On addition of sundry creditors, a debit (trade receivable) was shown and incorporated in P&L, so the revisional addition was factually incorrect and unsustainable. On notional interest, reconciliation with Form 26AS and balance sheet showed no variation, so the revisional action was unwarranted. On stock valuation, AO failed adequate inquiry into valuation method and consistency, so the revisional concern is upheld.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
