Revisability of return invalidation communications under tax procedure affirmed, impugned non revisional finding quashed and matter remitted for fresh...
Transferable duty credit scrips validity and bona fide transferee entitlement to exemption upheld where scrips were subsisting at import, appeals allo...
Classification of knocked down motor vehicle component imports: Notification benefit denied because items are standalone non kit parts requiring subst...
Reassessment against a deceased assessee: procedural defect mandates fresh reassessment; nonresponsive petitioner may be treated as legal representati...
Page of 4814
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
6461 to 6480 of 96262 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The text addresses revision jurisdiction over income-tax assessments concerning professional and technical fees, sundry creditors, notional interest under Ind AS, and stock valuation. On the alleged difference for professional and technical fees, the record shows AO queries, assessee replies and supporting documents, therefore the revisional finding was contrary to record and unsustainable. On addition of sundry creditors, a debit (trade receivable) was shown and incorporated in P&L, so the revisional addition was factually incorrect and unsustainable. On notional interest, reconciliation with Form 26AS and balance sheet showed no variation, so the revisional action was unwarranted. On stock valuation, AO failed adequate inquiry into valuation method and consistency, so the revisional concern is upheld.
The text addresses revision jurisdiction over income-tax assessments concerning professional and technical fees, sundry creditors, notional interest under Ind AS, and stock valuation. On the alleged difference for professional and technical fees, the record shows AO queries, assessee replies and supporting documents, therefore the revisional finding was contrary to record and unsustainable. On addition of sundry creditors, a debit (trade receivable) was shown and incorporated in P&L, so the revisional addition was factually incorrect and unsustainable. On notional interest, reconciliation with Form 26AS and balance sheet showed no variation, so the revisional action was unwarranted. On stock valuation, AO failed adequate inquiry into valuation method and consistency, so the revisional concern is upheld.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4814 
Join Channel 
