Courier transshipment of imported goods via named carrier to air cargo stations renewed until 30.01.2026; exemption conditional, strict controls apply...
Insurer's investment gains and investment write-downs face Section 263 revision; enquiry upheld, Rule 5(b)(ii) lapse sustained, late corrigendum quash...
Rectification proceedings invoked to recompute depreciation were held beyond the scope of the apparent mistake remedy because such powers address only manifest errors on the record and not detailed re-assessment; consequence: rectification to re-compute depreciation is invalid. Reopening of assessment was invalidated where the reasons and supervisory approval relied on incorrect AY references and unchecked figures, demonstrating non-application of mind and reliance on irrelevant information; consequence: the reopening notice vitiated for want of proper jurisdictional foundation and in favour of the assessee.
Rectification proceedings invoked to recompute depreciation were held beyond the scope of the apparent mistake remedy because such powers address only manifest errors on the record and not detailed re-assessment; consequence: rectification to re-compute depreciation is invalid. Reopening of assessment was invalidated where the reasons and supervisory approval relied on incorrect AY references and unchecked figures, demonstrating non-application of mind and reliance on irrelevant information; consequence: the reopening notice vitiated for want of proper jurisdictional foundation and in favour of the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.